To support my lifestyle, it would take 5.7 earths, 26.7 global acres, and 27.5 pounds of carbon dioxide. I was definitely shocked, because I thought I was doing a good job but I guess its not enough.
5.3 planet earths, 25.7 global acres, and 26.3 tons of carbon dioxide. this was not a surprise, it is probably due to the amount of driving my family does.
I would use 5 worlds and 22.3 acres. I thought that my world usage would be lower because I scored really low on a lot of the question. I think that only my dairy consumption and train usage was what threw me off.
i would have used 5.8 earths and 25.6 global acres. i thought this was very supprising becuase i didnt think that in my dialy life all the uses from me would take up 5.8 earths.
Christian Dallas If everyone lived like I did we would need 5.1 planets and 22.6 acres of land. I am surprised by this because I don't feel like I am using as many stuff as I do.
if everybody in the world lived like i do we would need to use 5.5 planet earths and 24.4 acres of land. this showed me that i need to stop buying unnecessary things, and only the vital things.
If everyone lived like I did we would need 5 planets and 22.3 acres of land. I think that even though it is better than most people, it is still more than the amount of resources the world has.
If everyone lived like I did, it would take 6.2 planet earths, 27.6 global acres, and 30.8 tons of carbon dioxide. To have enough resources for everyone. I was surprised by how much I used.
i use a lot of stuff. i put so much waste onto the earth that i souldnt be. i am going to start cutting back to reduce the amount of plooution that i put into the earth
Shane Libby I would have used 5.3 planet earths. I was very suprised by this because i thought about how other people use a lot more than me, and the fact that there wasn't one person that only at least one planet earth.
I used 6.8 planets and 38 acres of land. I was surprised because there are a lot of people on this planet and if I use that much than they must have really nothing.
I used 5.1 planets and 22.9 global acres of the earth's productive area. I was surprised to see that I wasted that many planets. That means that if I wasted so much that there are other people on the earth that barely have anything.
4.3 planets and i dont know the acres but it was close to 20. I thought this number was horriible (and i swear i was as honest as possible) but then when i looked at everyone elses I realized that 4.3 is not a horrible answer and we all seem to be living ike this. its shocking
I used 6.7 earths and 29.8 acres of the earths priductive area. To improve my result I beleive I need to recylce more, drive less and eat more local. I can take little steos day by day to improve my results
If everyone lived the same life as me we would use 5.1 planets, and each person would use 22.8 global acres of the earth's productive area.
I feel that I am not choosing correct ways to live my life environmentally friendly, I would have never imagined that if everybody lived like me we would use 5.1 planets, and this was very surprising. I feel that it is neccesary for me to make better choices because I do not have 5.1 planets, I only have one and it is all that I am limited to.
If everyone lived the way I did, we would need 4.6 Earths. My family uses 20.6 acres of land. I was suprised at this because I had no idea my family used so much resources.
If everyone lived the way i do, we would need 5.8 planets. I use 25.6 acres of land. And we would need 28.5 tons of carbon dioxide. That is mind-blowing
I used 5.3 planets. I think this is very sad because we don't have 5.3 planets we only have 1 and there is nothing we can do about that. So I need to lower my usage
I used 4.4 planets if everynoe lived like me. I also need 19.4 achres of land, and my carbon footprint is at 19.3. So I need to lower my usage, and use less energy
5.3 planets
ReplyDelete26 global acres...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThere would be 7.5 planets and 33.4 acres of land if evertone lived a life like me.
ReplyDeleteIt would take 6.2 planet earths, 27.6 global acres, and 30.8 tons of carbon dioxide.
ReplyDeleteMatt O'Connor
ReplyDelete6.3 planets
27.9 global acres
i didnt think i used that much but i stand corrected. i will try to cut back
please write a response about your usage.
ReplyDeleteI would use 4.2 planets and 18.7 global acres.
ReplyDelete3.6 planet earths
ReplyDelete16.2 global acres
I was sort of surprised that it was only that much, but it is still too much for our earthy.
Charles Harrington
To support my lifestyle, it would take 5.7 earths, 26.7 global acres, and 27.5 pounds of carbon dioxide. I was definitely shocked, because I thought I was doing a good job but I guess its not enough.
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived like I do, we would need 5.3 planets, and 23.5 global acres.
ReplyDeleteI believe that I got this number because of the amount of fuel my family and I use in our cars and our home.
-Drew Dempsey
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete5.5 Earths
ReplyDeleteI am not all that surprised...Seems pretty accurate
-Thomas Blakely
I got 4.5 Earths 21 global acres.
ReplyDeleteI'm kind of suprised because I did not think I'd score that high.
it would take 7.5 earths
ReplyDeletei am suprised i thought that it would be a lot smaller number. its a good thing everyone doesnt live like me
6.6 because i am me and i us a lot of gas (i have over 7 people in my house
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete5.4 earths and 24.1 global acres, I thought it was an average number because i only have 5 people living in my house
ReplyDelete5 earths, 22.3 global acres
ReplyDeleteBum Bump Bummmppp
P.S. that means postscript
p.p.s. there are 640 acres in a mile squared
5.3 planets, 22.3 acres. I am a pig, physically and mentally. It is not as bad as I thought, but still is pretty bad.
ReplyDelete5.9 planet Earths
ReplyDelete26.2 global acres
I am very surprised that I use six times the world average
5.3 planet earths, 25.7 global acres, and 26.3 tons of carbon dioxide.
ReplyDeletethis was not a surprise, it is probably due to the amount of driving my family does.
-Ryan Mahoney
5.9 planet Earths
ReplyDelete26.2 Acres
I am shocked that my lifestyle is almost six times the world average
I would use 5 worlds and 22.3 acres. I thought that my world usage would be lower because I scored really low on a lot of the question. I think that only my dairy consumption and train usage was what threw me off.
ReplyDeleteI would use 5.1 earths and 22.9 global acres. Not that suprising we just need to cut down on what we use
ReplyDelete5.6 planets, 27.6 acres, and 20.3 carbon dioxide. I was very surpprised by these results. It was a lot lower than I thought it would be.
ReplyDeleteP.J. McCurdy
There would be 5 planets for me
ReplyDeleteDavid Suslowicz
I would use 7.9 earths and 35.2 acres. I am very surprised because I thought I would score low. We all need to learn to cut down.
ReplyDeleteMatt Veale
i would have used 5.8 earths and 25.6 global acres. i thought this was very supprising becuase i didnt think that in my dialy life all the uses from me would take up 5.8 earths.
ReplyDeleteI would use 5.9 earths and 26 acres of land.
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived like me 2012 would have
happened a long time ago
4.9 earths and 21.8 acres
ReplyDeletei needed 5.7 earths and i feel this is bad but not as bad as other people. i still need to cut back on my usage.
ReplyDeleteChristian Dallas
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived like I did we would need 5.1 planets and 22.6 acres of land. I am surprised by this because I don't feel like I am using as many stuff as I do.
This is Christian Dallas
Joshua Martineau
ReplyDelete5.3 earths
23.8 global acres
This was surprising
if everybody in the world lived like i do we would need to use 5.5 planet earths and 24.4 acres of land. this showed me that i need to stop buying unnecessary things, and only the vital things.
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived like I did we would need 5 planets and 22.3 acres of land. I think that even though it is better than most people, it is still more than the amount of resources the world has.
ReplyDeleteChristopher Gleason
If everyone lived like I did, it would take 6.2 planet earths, 27.6 global acres, and 30.8 tons of carbon dioxide. To have enough resources for everyone. I was surprised by how much I used.
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived my life we would need 7.7 planets and 34 acres of land. It is alot of planets for one person.
ReplyDeleteit would take 6.2 planets and 27.5 acers of land.
ReplyDeletei use a lot of stuff. i put so much waste onto the earth that i souldnt be. i am going to start cutting back to reduce the amount of plooution that i put into the earth
Shane Libby
ReplyDeleteI would have used 5.3 planet earths. I was very suprised by this because i thought about how other people use a lot more than me, and the fact that there wasn't one person that only at least one planet earth.
I used 6.8 planets and 38 acres of land.
ReplyDeleteI was surprised because there are a lot of people on this planet and if I use that much than they must have really nothing.
I used 5.1 planets and 22.9 global acres of the earth's productive area. I was surprised to see that I wasted that many planets. That means that if I wasted so much that there are other people on the earth that barely have anything.
ReplyDelete4.3 planets and i dont know the acres but it was close to 20. I thought this number was horriible (and i swear i was as honest as possible) but then when i looked at everyone elses I realized that 4.3 is not a horrible answer and we all seem to be living ike this. its shocking
ReplyDeleteI used 6.7 earths and 29.8 acres of the earths priductive area. To improve my result I beleive I need to recylce more, drive less and eat more local. I can take little steos day by day to improve my results
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived the same life as me we would use 5.1 planets, and each person would use 22.8 global acres of the earth's productive area.
ReplyDeleteI feel that I am not choosing correct ways to live my life environmentally friendly, I would have never imagined that if everybody lived like me we would use 5.1 planets, and this was very surprising. I feel that it is neccesary for me to make better choices because I do not have 5.1 planets, I only have one and it is all that I am limited to.
it would take 3.6 planets for me, 16.2 global acres and 16.1 tons of co2
ReplyDeleteim kinda surprised it would take that much but not that surprised.
If everyone lived the way I did, we would need 4.6 Earths. My family uses 20.6 acres of land. I was suprised at this because I had no idea my family used so much resources.
ReplyDeleteIf everyone lived the way i do, we would need 5.8 planets. I use 25.6 acres of land. And we would need 28.5 tons of carbon dioxide. That is mind-blowing
ReplyDelete5.3 planets
ReplyDelete23.8 global acres
I was surprised at how many planets my lifestyle uses.
I used 2.2 earths and 3.9 global acres.I should stop polluting earth.
ReplyDeleteRyan o
I would need about 6.3 Earths and 28.2 global acres if everyone lived like me.
ReplyDeleteI think I should travel less and car pool with people.
I would need 6.8 planet earths and 30.4 global acres of land. I definatly need to cut back on the resources i am using.
ReplyDeleteI would have used 6.2 planets and 27.8 global acres of land. I was really suprised at how many plaents I woukld have used if everyone lived like me.
ReplyDeleteI used 5.3 planets. I think this is very sad because we don't have 5.3 planets we only have 1 and there is nothing we can do about that. So I need to lower my usage
ReplyDeleteI used 4.4 planets if everynoe lived like me. I also need 19.4 achres of land, and my carbon footprint is at 19.3. So I need to lower my usage, and use less energy
ReplyDeletei used 23.7 planets. i think i need to start thinking about the enviorment.
ReplyDeletei use about 8.9 planets
ReplyDeletei uses about 5 and a third planets. its odd that most of that is in fishing grounds and energy uses.
ReplyDelete